Case Studies
Case Studies: Measured Hockey IQ Results
Individual and team analysis. Measured results.
We work with individual players and full teams - and we have the proven, tracked data to show success with both.
Per-Game Improvement
Ben Austin
Goals / Game
0.17 → 0.60(+260%)
Assists / Game
0.42 → 1.60(+284%)
Points / Game
0.58 → 2.15(+269%)
Shots / Game
1.08 → 2.75(+155%)
First 12 Games - Before Hockey IQ Training
Goals2
Assists5
Points7
Shots / Game1.08
Final 20 Games - After Hockey IQ Training
Goals12
Assists32
Points43
Shots / Game2.75
Full Season 2023–24 - 32 GP · 14 G · 37 A · 51 PTS
First 12 games
After Hockey IQ training
Same season, same team - the split is the month Ben started Hockey IQ training.
"I came out really flat to start the year - I couldn't find the scoresheet and my confidence was starting to go. Alex helped me see a few small changes I needed to make and all of a sudden I was back to being the player I knew I could be."- Ben AustinRound 1 -#14 Overall · 2024 OHL U18 Priority Selection
Oakville Rangers - Sessions vs. Win Rate, 2025–26 Season
| Month | HockeyIQ4U Sessions | Win % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| September | 30 | 38% | |
| October | 44 | 55% | |
| November | 58 | 71% | Season Peak |
| December | 16 | 42% | Holiday Drop |
| January | 48 | 58% | |
| February | 42 | 50% | |
| March | 54 | 64% |
February reflects a compressed schedule with playoff seeding games against top-ranked opponents - including a win over a Top 10 MHR-ranked team in North America.
+0.512
Correlation between monthly HockeyIQ4U session volume and team win rate across the season - when the team trained more, it won more.
HockeyIQ4U Sessions
Win %
★ February - first win against a Top 10 MHR-ranked team in North America.